Human Rights Commission clarifies medical documentation needed for disability-related accommodation requests
Human Rights Commission clarifies medical documentation needed for disability-related accommodation requests
On February 1, 2017, the Ontario Human Rights Commission released a policy statement that seeks to clarify the type and scope of the medical information that employees need to provide to their employers to support disability-related requests for accommodation.
The policy statement clarifies that employees will generally be expected to produce medical documentation that includes:
- confirmation that the person has a disability;
- the limitations or needs associated with the disability;
- whether the person can perform the essential duties or requirements of the job with or without accommodation;
- the type of accommodation(s) that may be needed to allow the person to fulfill the essential duties or requirements of the job; and
- regular updates about when the person expects to come back to work, if they are on leave.
The Commission confirmed that overbroad requests for private medical information – such as diagnostic information – undermine the dignity and privacy of employees with disabilities. Therefore, where more information about an employee’s disability is needed, the information requested must be the least intrusive of the employee’s privacy while still giving the employer enough information to make an informed decision about the accommodation.
The Commission also confirmed that generally employers do not have the right to know an employee’s confidential medical information, such as the cause of the disability, diagnosis, symptoms or treatment, unless these clearly relate to the accommodation being sought, or the employee’s needs are complex, challenging or unclear and more information is needed.
This policy supplements the Policy on Ableism and Discrimination Based on Disability, which was released by the Commission in September 2016. That policy replaced the Commission’s 2001 policy on the duty to accommodate and is twice as long, including the case law on disability and accommodation over the past 15 years.
Prudent employers will read the Commission’s new policies and review their internal accommodation policies and practices to ensure that they are in compliance.
by Stefanie Di Francesco
A Cautionary Note
The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.
© McMillan LLP 2016
Insights (5 Posts)View More
More Than Meets the Eye: The Legal Implications of British Columbia’s Agreement to Recognize Aboriginal Title Over Haida Gwaii
An analysis of legal implications related to the BC Government's agreement with the Haida Nation to recognize Aboriginal title over Haida Gwaii.
Lessons Learned from the TTC’s Ransomware Attack
Lessons learned from the recent investigation by the Ontario IPC into the effectiveness of the TTC's cybersecurity measures and ransomware attack response
Don’t Get Caught by Canada’s Patent Novelty Grace-Period
The key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.
Shifting Gears – Canada to Consider New Motor Vehicle Equipment Regulations to Help Prevent Auto Theft
Transport Canada announces plan to update safety standards to combat auto theft.
Budget 2024: Legislative Changes of Note for Investment Funds
In Budget 2024, the Government acknowledges that the restrictions placed on the property that may be held by registered plans have become unduly complex.
Get updates delivered right to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time.